اندیشهفلسفهخردگفتگوحکمتمعناپرسشفرهنگ
In a session critiquing religious intellectualism, Davoud Mahdavizadegan distinguished it from Islamic intellectualism, arguing that the latter is grounded in a monotheistic system where rationality and devotion are compatible—unlike religious intellectualism.

A Sociological and Philosophical Critique of Religious Intellectualism and Its Relationship with the Academy and Stagnation in the Humanities
Hujjat al-Islam Davood Mahdavizadegan | Dr. Seyyed Javad Miri | Azar 1394
At the session on religious intellectualism, Hujjat al-Islam Davood Mahdizadegan, head of the Political Theoretical Studies research group at the Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, first examined the ambiguities of religious intellectualism and articulated the distinction between religious intellectualism and Islamic intellectualism, stating: Islamic intellectualism is based on a monotheistic system, but religious intellectualism is not; unlike religious intellectualism, in Islamic intellectualism, rationality and devotion are compatible . . .
To obtain the video of this session, refer to the source.
Sociology
Sociology
Religion
Religion
Religion
Discussion0 comments
No comments yet; let yours be the first voice.