اندیشهفلسفهخردگفتگوحکمتمعناپرسشفرهنگ
Fixating on specific instances of a general moral value while remaining indifferent to broader injustice is itself a moral distortion. Abolqasem Fanaei argues that when values conflict, the less important must be sacrificed for the more important.

A person who is sensitive about homosexuality and wine-drinking and dons a shroud to combat clapping and foul language, yet shows no sensitivity whatsoever toward despotism, political oppression, violence, discrimination, and the violation of people's rights, their sensitivities are not moral sensitivities. Likewise, someone who emphasizes economic justice and the equitable distribution of wealth, but is indifferent to political justice and the equitable distribution of power (i.e., democracy), cannot claim that their concern is a moral concern stemming from moral considerations. Indeed, the sincerity of such individuals must be viewed with doubt. In truth, excessive emphasis on certain second- and third-tier moral values, or insisting on specific instances of a general moral value, is itself considered a form of moral deviation, because such emphasis causes the individual and society to become heedless of and indifferent to the violation of more important moral values. And if someone truly has a concern for preserving values, the degree of importance they attach to values and the sensitivity they show toward their violation will inevitably not be uniform; rather, it will be proportionate to the degree of importance of those values themselves, and in situations of conflict and rivalry, they will sacrifice less important values for more important ones, and in defending values, they will first address the more important ones, and will not commit greater wrongs to prevent a single wrong.
.
.
.
Religion
Religion
Religion
Religion
Religion
Discussion1 comments
بنام خدا امروز ۵-۵-۱۳۹۵ ساعت هشت بعداز ظهر است به اعتقاد اینجانب نهادینه شدن وحاکمیت قانون یعنی اینکه میپذیریم که همه انسانها دارای نقاط ضعف هایی هستند وهیچ کس مصون نیست وقانون یعنی برقراری عدالت بطور برابر .رونق جوامع استبدادی مرهون تمرکز وبهره برداری از نقاط ضعف انسانهاست برای مثال نظامیان دریک حکومت اگر حتی مامور به انجام عملیاتی واعمالی کاملا ضد مردمی هستند نباید بخاطر گذشته خود از افشای اسرارشان بترسند زیرا یک نظامی مامور به اطاعت از مافوق خود است واهل چون چرا وتحلیل نیست استمرار حاکمیت جوامع استبدادی امروزه بهیچوجه پذیرفتنی نیست ولی نباید هیچ نظامی وسیاستمداری را از تغییر شرایط ترساند زیرا فقط به استمرار بی قانونی واستبداد کمک میشود