اندیشهفلسفهخردگفتگوحکمتمعناپرسشفرهنگ
Philosophical arguments for abstaining from meat-eating rest on the observation that animals, like humans, experience pain and suffering. But does this fact make eating meat unethical? A Pargar roundtable with Arash Naraghi and Esfandiar Tabari.

Philosophical arguments for abstaining from meat are relatively new. Among these arguments is one that animals, like humans, have rights. The nature and extent of this right is a matter of debate, but its basis is the elementary observation that animals, like humans, experience pain and suffering. Can this argument persuade you of the inferior moral status of the act of eating meat?
Pargar roundtable titled "Is Eating Meat Unethical?" with the presence of Arash Naraghi and Esfandiar Tabari:
.
Listen to the audio of this roundtable on Anchor | Castbox | Google Podcasts | Apple Podcasts | Spotify
Philosophy
Philosophy
Philosophy
Philosophy
Literature
Discussion0 comments
No comments yet; let yours be the first voice.