اندیشهفلسفهخردگفتگوحکمتمعناپرسشفرهنگ
Religion
A New Reading of the Foundations of Religious Thought: A Lecture Series by Ayatollah Sayyid Kamal al-Haydari
Ayatollah Seyyed Kamal Haydari, in his lecture series “A New Reading of the Foundations of Religious Thought,” argues that the sole criterion for judging human beings is the possession of “reasoned proof.” A belief grounded in rational demonstration, even if it does not correspond to reality, will be excused and rewarded on the Day of Judgment.
Ayatollah Sayyid Kamal al-Haydari: The sole epistemic path for the rightfulness of scholars and followers of religions and denominations is to possess a “proof”; indeed, there is no other criterion whatsoever for the reckoning of human beings: “The path is the proof.” If anyone knows of another path, let them show it to us as well! It is fundamentally impossible for a person to be reckoned and questioned for an action—even if their action and belief were correct—except through this path, that they had a proof and a binding argument for their act; meaning, if they do not possess a proof, even if they have arrived at a correct belief, it will not be accepted from them on the Day of Resurrection!
For example, I am currently a Muslim and a Shi‘a, and I say that the truth lies with Islam and Shi‘ism. Now, if someone asks me on what basis and with which criterion and standard I say that the only true religion is Islam? In response, I say, based on such-and-such “proof.” I bring forth several proofs that Islam is the best religion and that I must be a Muslim. But if, on the Day of Resurrection, it becomes clear that all or part of the truth was in another religion, for instance Christianity, and God Almighty asks me, “Why did you not act upon the teachings of Christianity?!” I will answer, “O God, the ‘proof’ guided me to the rightfulness and correctness of Islam.” Nevertheless, can God say, “You should have had faith and belief in something for whose correctness you had no proof, and indeed were certain it was false”? No; because He Himself has stated in the Qur’an: “Say: ‘Produce your proof, if you are truthful’” (al-Baqarah/111); meaning, everyone must bring a proof and a demonstration to establish their claim; otherwise, their speech is not at all heard or acceptable. The logic of the Qur’an is a rational and epistemic logic.
A human being is not reckoned and taken to task except by means of a proof, but where someone has no reasoning and demonstration for their belief and conviction, reckoning about them is entirely meaningless, and their claim is not accepted! If someone had a proof for the correctness and truth of their religion and denomination, they are excused and rewarded on the Day of Resurrection—even if the contrary is uncovered!—but if they had no proof for acting upon the teachings of a specific religion or denomination, even if their religion and denomination were truly right and corresponded to reality, God will not accept it from them!; because the criterion in the reckoning of human beings is the proof and demonstration upon which they have based their certainty and conviction. And as for whether that proof turns out to correspond to reality or to contradict reality, that is beyond the capacity of human beings; because, due to the lack of infallibility, no one can make their own reasoning correspond to reality and the fact of the matter, and remain safe from any error and mistake.
.
.
Session One: From the Perspective of the Qur’an, What Distinguishes Humans from Other Beings?!
.
Session Two: “The Theory of the Permissibility of Adhering to All Divine and Human Religions and Denominations”
.
Session Three: “The Theory of the Permissibility of Adhering to All Divine and Human Religions and Denominations”
.
Session Four: “The Theory of the Permissibility of Adhering to All Divine and Human Religions and Denominations”
.
Session Five: “The Theory of the Permissibility of Adhering to All Divine and Human Religions and Denominations”
.
To be continued…
.
.
Discussion7 comments
فیلم جلسات عربی در کدام سایتِ عربی است؟
در سایت خود ایشان: alhaydari.com
تا آنجا که ما می دانیم اسم این سلسله جلسات (نظریه جواز تعبد به جمیع ملل و نحل است ) که اخیرا به زبان فارسی هفته ای یک جلسه برگزار می شود و در گذشته به زبان عربی و تحت عنوان مواقف فی الصمیم منتشر شده بود و البته با شکلی متفاوت اما آنچه که نوشته اید (قرائتی جدید از مبانی فکر دینی) سلسله جلساتی است که دو روز اول هر هفته القا میشه و عربیه و ظاهرا در حال حاضر به طور مصداقی دارند مبحث مهدویت رو با قرائت جدید بررسی می کنند. فیلم جلسات عربی در سایت عربی هست.
حال اگر در قیامت خدا از شما پرسید: من در قرآن گفته بودم که دین اسلام را برای مکه و حومه فرو فرستادم و باز هم تآکید کردهام که برای هر قوم پیغمبری به زبان خودشان مبعوث کردم، شما چه پاسخ و دلیلی برای ایمان آوردن به دین اسلام میتوانید بیاورید؟
می گوییم خدا تو گفتی مالک همه جهانی گفتی طومار آسمان ها و زمین در هم می پیچی می گوییم تاکید بر مشاهده جان کردی و تفکر اندیشه می گوییم فلسفه غرب خوندیم کدام یک از نحله های فلسفه غرب موفق بود تا به آن ایمان بیاوریم خود غرب گفت شکست خوردم من رو به تبیین موفق و منطقی که منجر به infinite regrees فلسفه و توجیه نمی شود آوردم چون خدا یا می دونی که توجیه خود نیازمند توجیه است پس در یک جا اگر متوقف شود توجیه به مشکل تسلسل نمی خورد چون توصیف کتابی که فرستادی عقلانی انسانی معقول و پر از اندیشه بود و فلاسفه یا مثل هایدگر توجیه گر فاشیسم بودند و یا مثل کارل پاپر ثنا گوی لیبرال دموکراسی حاوی تناقض واژگانی سخن اعراب را منطقی انسانی عقلانی و اندیشمندانه تر از فلاسفه متظاهر توجیه گر جنگ جهانی برآمده از لیبرتال دموکراسی یافتم و گفتم آدم عاقل بایست عقل و منطق را بپذیرد پس اسلام آوردم
ما را به دلیل پیروی نکردن از زرتشت به آتش دوزخ میانذازند
در قرآن آیات دیگر هم هست که میگه اسلام برای تمام جهانیانه، یک نمونه اش آیه 1 سوره «فرقان» است که مى گوید: «تَبارَکَ الَّذِی نَزَّلَ الْفُرْقانَ عَلى عَبْدِهِ لِیَکُونَ لِلْعالَمِینَ نَذِیراً»؛ (جاوید و پر برکت است خداوندى که قرآن را بر بنده اش نازل کرد، تا همه جهانیان را انذار کند). در ضمن اسلام دعوت کرده به دنبال دین حق و درست باشیم و پیرو برهان و دلیل محکم. ایت الله حیدری هم در کتب اعتقادیشون اثبات کرده اند که فقط اسلام دین حقه و از اسلام فقط مذهب تشیع.