اندیشهفلسفهخردگفتگوحکمتمعناپرسشفرهنگ
Mostafa Mehraein sees Iranian history as an accumulation of fragmented movements that have stifled the opportunity for reflection. He describes the political system as monologic and believes the way out of the current predicament is for the state to speak the truth.

Didar News—Nasrin Niknam: "Our country has always been subject to various movements, from the Tobacco Movement to the Green Movement, having, of course, passed through movements such as the Constitutional Revolution, the Nationalization of the Oil Industry movement, the Iranian people's revolution in '57, and the epic of the 2nd of Khordad '76 in between," states Dr. Mostafa Mehraeen, university professor and sociologist of culture, on the Principle 27 program, adding: Our country is an accumulation of these events, which has faced great ruptures in history and has been unable to continue its path in a linear and continuous manner.
He adds to these events that the country has been so embroiled in these movements that its thinkers, intellectuals, and even politicians have had no opportunity for contemplation and thought to solve problems; of course, you should also know that the country did not have enough scientific and specialized thinkers either.
Mehraeen has an interesting interpretation regarding the underlying reason for the country's events, saying: The conflict that has occurred in the country these days is a conflict between two modes of thought, which, in simpler terms, resembles a quarrel between a father and mother.
According to this sociologist, the country's political system moved towards a monophonic society in the very early years of the revolution, and religious forces quickly replaced the intellectual political forces, eliminating or suppressing other individuals through various means.
This university professor adds: What happens during the Khatami administration that the Dialogue Among Civilizations takes shape, but with the thinking of the subsequent administration, that of Ahmadinejad, its flavor is changed by introducing a one-sided dialogue with the savior of the world.
Pointing out that under the current circumstances, the government must come forward and state the truths, Mehraeen sees the only way out of this predicament in this very thought and perspective, and says: At present, everyone considers the government a lying government, because the truths have never been told to the people; that is, they haven't said whether we killed Mahsa or not, whether we killed Nika Shakarami or not, and then they steered the matter in such a direction that the Baloch child had a weapon, but the reality was that the Baloch child didn't even have a stone.
.
.
.
.
Source: Didar News Television
.
.
Watch the video of this interview on YouTube
Listen to this interview on Anchor
Listen to this interview on Castbox
Listen to this interview on Spotify
.
.
Sociology
Political Science
Sociology
Sociology
Political Science
Discussion1 comments
صدانت عزیز، سلام دوستان گرامی چرا در بارهی پدیدهی مستقل، سنجیده کار، تمام وقت و مهجور و غریبِ سعید مدنی که، فقط جامعه شناسی می کند ولاغیر، سکوتی غیرعادی کرده اید. آیا ارزش اندیشه و گفتمان بدیع او از بحثهای جناب رنانی و بسیاری دیگر از اهالی جریان غالب کمتر است؟ اتفاقا او هم مثل میثمی به مصداق ها هم کمتر می پردازد و به خط مشی ها نظر دارد.