اندیشهفلسفهخردگفتگوحکمتمعناپرسشفرهنگ
Mostafa Malekian wrote an article criticising the translation of the book Religious Thought in the Twentieth Century, which the journal Naqd va Nazar published in the winter of 1996–97 under the title 'A Deplorable Translation of a Delightful Book'—a critique that prompted a response from the translators and his subsequent rejoinder.

The affair began when Mostafa Malekian wrote an article in the winter of 1996–97 criticizing the translation of the book Religious Thought in the Twentieth Century, and the journal Naqd va Nazar published this article. The title of this critique was itself telling: "The Formula of White Agate or the Chalcedonian Creed?! A Lamentable Translation of a Delightful Book" The publication of this translation critique had a particular resonance in the philosophical and religious-studies circles of that era. The translators of that book (Messrs. Mohammad Mohammad-Rezaei and Abbas Sheikh Shoaei) published a response in the next issue of the same journal (Spring and Summer 1997) titled "Examining a Critique (A Lamentable Translation of a Delightful Book)" and addressed some of the problems and criticisms. But this response of theirs led to a subsequent critical article by Mostafa Malekian. In a later issue of the same journal, in an article titled "A Response to a Pseudo-Response", Malekian attempted to show that the translators' reply was unconvincing.
.
In this post, Mostafa Malekian's critique of the translation of the book Religious Thought in the Twentieth Century is presented.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Philosophy
Literature
Philosophy
Philosophy
Philosophy
Discussion0 comments
No comments yet; let yours be the first voice.