
Mathematics and the Critique of ThoughtIranianb. 1971
این باور که جهان بر پایه عدالت طراحی شده، اصلیترین توجیه برای نابرابری و یکی از بزرگترین موانع ذهنی در مسیر اصلاحات اجتماعی بهسوی عدالت و شکوفایی همگانی در میان ایرانیان است. مانع دیگر، پرسپکتیو قشری و محدود افراد و تأثیرپذیری از موقعیتِ فردی است؛ تا زمانی که کلِ جامعه — با تمام بخشهای دورافتاده و یا پنهانش — مد نظر نباشد، هر نظری درباره عدالت، خطاست؛ چرا که حقیقت را میپوشاند و تنها به فریب خود و دیگران منجر میشود. تلاش برای برقراری عدالت در ایران، مبارزهای در ژرفناست.
Manouchehr Zaker is an Iranian mathematician, a full professor, and a distinguished graduate of Sharif University of Technology. His specialized research has been published mainly in graph theory, graph coloring, and discrete mathematics, and alongside his academic work, he has also written about the state of the university, critical thinking, and the poverty of thought in Iran.
Manouchehr Zaker is an Iranian mathematician and researcher, recognized as a full professor and a distinguished graduate of Sharif University of Technology. He has conducted research in mathematics, particularly in discrete mathematics, graph theory, and graph coloring, and his name is associated with the Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences in Zanjan as well as scientific collaborations within Iran's basic sciences community.
Zaker's academic record includes numerous articles in specialized mathematics and combinatorics journals, including works on the chromatic number of graphs, coloring, directed graphs, Hamiltonian paths, labeling, and algorithmic problems in graph structures. These areas are significant in discrete mathematics and theoretical computer science, and his research can be evaluated within this framework.
In addition to his specialized work in mathematics, Zaker has in recent years also written in the Persian-language public sphere about the university, basic sciences, thinking, dogmatism, cognitive biases, and the state of thought in Iran. Among his well-known writings and topics are discussions on the "poverty of thinking in Iran," "cognitive dissonance," "confirmation bias," "enlightenment and dogmatism," and critiques of the state of the university institution. His significance for Sedanet lies primarily in the link between scientific rigor, a concern for university reform, and attention to critical thinking and the pathology of thought in Iran.